There is such a thing as a bad question

Thursday, April 5, 2012 by Troy Powell

Another in my 140-word series.

As customer experience professionals, we often conduct customer surveys that primarily ask customers to provide answers from a defined set of response options. While I do believe we need to do more qualitative, ethnographic research, I want to take a different direction with this post.

Instead, my hypothesis is that our focus on closed-end survey questions leads us to ask "bad" questions outside of surveys. This hit me as I read this summary of Killer Questions by Phil McKinney. Good survey questions basically ask customers to confirm or disconfirm a hypothesis (our support is great, do you agree or disagree?). These questions are fine in a survey, but we need to use more investigative, Socratic questions within our organizations to drive the learning and innovation necessary to create the customer-focused strategies our companies need to thrive in the marketplace.

 

The unique perspective of the channel

Friday, March 23, 2012 by Leslie Pagel

Customer Strategy ConsultingWhile Channel Partners are customers too, unlike the traditional customer, partners are able to provide a unique perspective. When it comes to Voice of Partner versus Voice of Customer survey research, consider these four differences:

1 - Many Channel Partners sell competing products and services giving them a unique perspective on what drives customer purchase decisions. Their input can help companies understand what causes a customer to purchase one product over another competing product.

2 - In a similar manner, OEMs can use partner input to understand what drives a partner to recommend one product over another.

3 - Many partners are combining an OEM's products with other products to deliver a complete solution. Having a better understanding of solution offerings, can be valuable input for the product group.

4 - Customers who purchase from a channel partner often go to the partner for support. Partners can provide a unique perspective on what is needed to support the indirect customer. This input can also be leveraged for serving the direct customer.

Corporate business strategy can benefit from insights provided by the channel. The partner perspective can be used to grow market share, enhance the product roadmap, and deliver an experience that both direct and indirect customers value.

If you are working to create a customer focused leadership position, consider including the perspective from all customer types.

Photo credit: stevendepolo

What do the cloud, social media, and lean innovation have in common?

Tuesday, February 28, 2012 by Leslie Pagel

What do the cloud, social media, and lean innovation have in common? Each are impacting voice of the customer programs and changing the way we measure, manage, and deliver an exceptional and differentiated customer experience.

Cloud computing: The cloud changes the way customers buy products. Customers move from product ownership to product subscription. In doing this, the switching barriers are lessened for the customer and the company is rewarded with recurring revenue. Cloud-based companies need to adapt their voice of the customer program to focus on predicting customer renewals.

Social media: Customers don't need to wait for a company to conduct a customer survey research program to share their thoughts and feelings. With social media, customers have channels to share their feedback with the company, not to mention their closest friends, fans, and followers. Companies are reacting to this trend by monitoring the discussion and engaging in the conversation on public and private social media forums. This has resulted in a voice of the customer platform that companies are still trying to understand.

Lean innovation: Have you ever thought that product development happens in a bubble with engineers, scientists, and innovators isolated in a building and left to their own devices? This paradigm is shifting and the voice of the customer is becoming more important throughout the product development cycle. In this article, Ravi Aron, senior fellow from Wharton's Mack Center for Technological Innovation implies, "[Lean] begins its journey when an organization attempts to hear the voice of the customer." As the innovation process looks to adopt lean principles to reduce time and costs, one essential ingredient is the customer perspective, putting the customer perspective in greater demand.

In a world where the only constant is change, our voice of the customer programs must be adaptable to support our ever changing customer retention strategies.

Lessons from the CEO of the XLVI Super Bowl Host Committee

Tuesday, February 14, 2012 by Leslie Pagel

In this video, Allison Melangton, CEO of the XLVI Super Bowl Host Committeee, shares some of her lessons learned while planning and organizing the 2012 Super Bowl.

Allison's advice serves as a nice reminder for those in charge of developing and executing customer retention strategies. Consider these tips:

Be Bold: Allison says, "If you really believe in something, be bold about it, even though you might have some doubters." Are your customer strategies bold? If not, why?

Make it Different: Allison talks about how they decided to use a different approach to submit the bid for the Super Bowl. Instead of sending the bid to the NFL owners via UPS, they decided to have 8th graders deliver the bid. Are your customer retention strategies unique or are you delivering the same customer experience as others?  

Don't Let Logistics Stand in the Way: As a customer strategist, we often face logistical challenges such as, how are we going to train our entire sales organization, or how can we get the right customer names and contact information for our customer survey research program. We can no longer let logistical challenges stand in our way. What logistics are holding you back?

Focus on Your Strengths: Whether or not someone tells you that, "all of your work is self-inflicted," we must focus first on our strengths. What strengths are your customer retention stratgies focused on?

So, is that good or bad?

Wednesday, February 1, 2012 by Leslie Pagel
Customer Survey Research Best PracticesWhen sharing results from your customer survey research, have you been asked, "So, are we doing good or bad?"

When designing a voice of the customer (VoC) program, one of the best practices is to share some type of perspective when presenting results.  

To do this, consider one of these four options:

Add benchmark questions to your survey: Many companies have a couple of questions asking the customer to evaluate a benchmark company. This is an ideal approach for many because it focuses on the perceptions of your customers and allows you to compare what they think about you versus another company.  

Benchmark against yourself: Companies can answer the “good or bad” question by looking at key segments within their business. For this approach, identify the customer segments with high performance scores and use those as the benchmark. The benefit of this approach is the "best-in-class" score is most likely achievable with your existing products/services.

Look at scores over time: As a customer survey research program matures, it is natural to look at changes over time. This becomes a good source for perspective since it will highlight improvements and/or declines. In year one, you create the benchmark and then measure progress against it over time.  

Secondary Research: There are a variety of secondary research options. These secondary sources can be a good benchmark. However, they do have some draw-backs, which are: timing of the program, differences in the respondent profile (e.g., different geographies or customer roles), or different research designs (e.g., scales used or questions asked).

As you prepare to share results from your customer survey research, don't just share the score, add some perspective by using one of these four methods.

The Impact of Mobile Devices

Thursday, October 13, 2011 by Turning Feedback Into Action

Today an Indianapolis Star article began with, “The machines ARE taking over.” 

According to the article, mobile phone use continues to grow, to the point there are now more mobile devices than human beings in the United States. In fact, some estimate mobile phone penetration is already at more than 80% globally.

Steve Largent, president of CTIA reinforces the importance of mobile devices, “Clearly, we’re using wireless more every day, and the consensus of experts is that demand will continue to skyrocket by more than 50 times within the next five years.”

As customer strategists, we need to pay attention. We have to consider the ramifications on how we gather customer feedback now and in the future. It is very likely that some of your customers are already using (or trying to use) smart phones for your Customer Listening effort. 

Take the impact of mobile devices into account for your 2012 Customer Program program to improve the customer experience: 

·         Make certain the survey system recognizes when a mobile device is being used.  

·         Ensure the survey format adjusts so that mobile users find it easier to navigate through the questionnaire.

·         Consider survey length and assess the need to have alternate paths depending on the type of technology being used. 

Some early research suggests that drop off rates are in line with traditional online respondents, however, given the nature of mobile phone use and potential connectivity issues, I recommend that you consider the experience from your customer’s perspective.   It’s even more critical to make sure the survey is relevant and keeps your customer engaged.

Our technology at Walker recognizes mobile users and has the ability to adjust the survey/research accordingly. Your Walker account team can help you with survey content. What are you waiting for? 

Kitty Radcliff
Vice President, Consulting Services 


Three reporting must-haves

Thursday, September 8, 2011 by Leslie Pagel
Customer Strategy ConsultingAs customer strategists we are often called upon to share customer insights and recommendations. 

Based on feedback from more than 100 customer strategists, consider these three must-haves for your next presentation:

1. Your audience is looking to learn something new; something they don't already know. Highlighting an unexpected insight can grab (and keep) the attention of your audience.

2. The recommendations must be well thought out. While this seems obvious, one common pit fall for a customer strategist is to assume they need to show all of the data. Instead of spewing reams of data, a best practice is to focus on the elements that tie to your customer retention strategies and the activities that are important to the audience. 

3. Try to avoid using customer survey research terms and use terms the company uses. This will help make the information relevant for the audience. At the last Walker Forum, we started a list of common research terms. Avoid using these during your next presentation - top-2 box, sample,  mean, and regression. 

To some, customer survey research is all about the number

Friday, July 8, 2011 by Leslie Pagel
To some, customer survey research is all about the number. But, to others, it is about the action, the progress, and the reward.

Earlier this week I had an opportunity to talk with an enlightened executive from a large, global software company. During the conversation we discussed collecting customer feedback for purposes of tracking a number.

His thought went something like this: "That is like looking in a mirror and I don't want to just look in the mirror. I want to discover new insights, new ideas...things I don't already know."

The fact is, we need both. We need a way to measure our progress, to make sure we look good in the eyes of customers. But, we must also extend the customer perspective to enable "the reveal." To allow us to see something about ourselves that we haven't seen before.

Three benefits of combining solicited feedback with social media discussions

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 by Leslie Pagel

Companies can enhance their customer retention strategies by combining the solicited feedback from their customer survey programs, complaint management systems, and sponsored communities with the unsolicited feedback that is available through social media.

Doing this can create the following outcomes:

Customer Strategy Consulting - combining solicited with social media1. Appropriate resource allocation. By relying solely on one type of information the complete picture might not be visible. However, if both solicited and social media discussions are viewed together it will accentuate areas of the business that impact both forms of feedback.

Consider this case study where customer feedback was gathered through a sophisticated and scientific survey program and combined with unsolicited feedback through social media. By combining these information sources, the company was able to allocate resources to the areas that impacted both information sources, instead of the loudest chatter on social media.

2. Engage in the right conversations. One objective for the social media strategist is to be active in the conversations that customers are having about the products, services, and brand. However, this can be a challenge since customers have a lot of different conversations. 

By combining solicited feedback with social media discussions, social media strategists can gain a clear view of the topics that create customer loyalty and understand how these areas are being discussed via social media. With this information, they can prioritize and engage in the conversations that will strengthen their relationships with customers.

3. Measure the ROI. Social media strategists continue to be challenged with demonstrating the ROI of their initiatives. Essentially companies want to know how their efforts are improving brand awareness or increasing customer retention. Through the solicited feedback, companies can identify if their social media strategy is paying off.

For example, one company found that customers who engage via social media are more loyal than customers who don't engage with them via social media. With this, they are able to segment and explore aspects of the customer relationship that are similar and different for customers who engage in social media versus those who don't. This can uncover approaches to increase the number of customers that engage online and build customer loyalty. 

Customer focused leadership has evolved tremendously over the past decade. Social media is one form of customer listening that isn't going away and it is time that we start integrating it into our voice of the customer programs.

Confidentiality does not excuse you from follow-up

Wednesday, June 1, 2011 by Leslie Pagel
Customer Survey Research - dealing with confidentialityWhen planning your customer survey research, one of the items to consider is whether to ask customers if they are willing to share their responses (referred to as confidentiality) or tell them up-front their individual results will be shared in an effort to improve the relationship.

There are pros and cons to each approach. However, neither excuse a company from taking action and closing the loop with customers. 

If you choose to ask customers the question, it can make the follow-up activity a little trickier. For this situation, consider these best practices:  

Send a follow-up thank you letter letting the customer know the feedback is appreciated. Reinforce their individual results will be kept confidential. The letter might say something like:

Thank you for taking the time to provide your candid feedback. It is greatly appreciated. Your individual feedback will be combined with feedback from other customers and used to identify areas needing improvement.

Once we have reviewed the collective feedback, we will share a summary and the improvement areas with your account manager. At this time, your account manager will schedule time with you to share the information and discuss how the improvements will benefit you individually.

Share a summary of the results with the group in charge of the customer follow-up. Include the areas of focus, explaination of why the areas were selected, and the anticipated outcome if improved. During this stage, it is also important to educate them on the follow-up process. Be sure to include:
  • Their role
  • Why it is important to follow-up with customers
  • What you want them to share with customers
  • What you don't want them to share with customers
  • What you would like them to do after the follow-up
Conduct the follow-up. During this stage, it is important to listen carefully to see how the aggregate information aligns with the individual customer need. During the conversation, consider asking these questions:
  • How closely does this feedback align with your experience?
  • Will these areas of focus have the greatest impact on your experience or are there others that would have a greater impact?
  • While the company is looking at these areas for improvement, are there any additional suggestions that we can focus on to improve the value you receive?
Ask the person who conducts the follow-up to record feedback from the discussion in a central location. This step is important because it allows you to understand the sentiment of the individual relationship, build account specific needs into the account plan, and quantify the anticipated return of improvements for that customer.  

Closing the loop on customer feedback is an essential ingredient in your customer retention strategies. It will help you build trust, retain their business, and grow market share. 

Epsilon’s System Security Failure and How it Will Impact Customer Listening Initiatives

Tuesday, April 12, 2011 by Customer Feedback Analysis

If you are like me, you have likely received a number of email notifications from companies stating that your email address may have been compromised. As a result of a security breach at email distributor Epsilon, email information was hacked that impacted 2% of Epsilon’s customers (for a list of known companies that were impacted, click here). Epsilon reportedly sends more than 40 billion emails annually, so there is a good chance that you or your customers were impacted by this security breach.

What does this have to do with the customer experience? In short, it erodes the trust that exists between the customer and the organization, and it is difficult to imagine a situation in which customer loyalty can be cultivated in the absence of trust. The reasons for this decay in trust are fairly intuitive:

1)     Customers expect companies to guard their data – It is likely that every opt-in process disclosed that these organizations used a third party to manage elements of the customer experience (communication, promotion, etc.); however, customers rightfully expected that all steps would be taken to ensure that any information shared would be properly guarded.

2)     Communication has been sparse – To Epsilon’s credit, it appears that they moved swiftly in alerting their customers once the breach was discovered; however, the details have not been as forthcoming to end consumers. Moreover, the tone of these messages has taken on a decidedly legal tone (likely for good reason), including statements that the company has been assured that only name and email data were compromised. As a consumer, I was left with the feeling that the company was relaying what they had been told, but they were not entirely confident in what they were reporting.

3)     There is a feeling of a lack of control – The tone of the messages sent by companies suggest a lack of control of how sensitive customer data is stored, managed and used. This lack of control extends to the end consumer – that is, I feel as though once I share my information, I have lost all control with respect to how my data are managed. This increases skepticism, which reduces trust.

What should we expect the fallout to be as a result of this breach? For starters, we should expect that spamming and phishing attempts will skyrocket – this has been a topic that has been addressed in nearly every notification I have received. As a result, customers will be more apprehensive with sharing their information, and will be less likely to click on links in emails (for example, to take a customer survey). This will adversely impact response rates, which will beg the question as to whether our customer listening efforts are truly representative in nature.

Fortunately, there are steps we can take to proactively address this issue. In addition to advice provided by my colleague Becca Lewis (see Becca’s blogs on response rates here, here, here and here), Walker has written a book on tactics and strategies to increase response rates (if you are a Walker client and do not have this booklet, please ask your account team for a copy). Above and beyond this information, there are three additional steps companies should consider when launching a customer listening initiative in light of the Epsilon breach:

1)     Provide a way to validate that the survey is legitimate – Many of our clients will construct a special website that customers can visit to validate that the survey request is legitimate. This is also a great opportunity to set expectations on how your organization will use the information (and the follow-up that customers should expect to see).

Given the extra concern over clicking links in emails, it may be preferable to have a link available from your home page to route customers to this page (as opposed to providing a link in the email notification). This also reinforces to all customers (even those who were not selected in the sample) that you are focused on listening to – and acting on – customer feedback.

2)     Do not ask questions you should know the answer to – This is particularly important with respect to any sensitive account information such as account numbers, contact information, etc. Data elements such as these should be linked from your CRM data so that they can be leveraged in the analysis on the back end. This will not only streamline the survey process and prevent concern about sensitive information, but it will also focus on the most important aspect of the survey – getting the customer’s feedback on items that you do not already know.

3)     Communicate early and often – This is a common theme, but it bears repeating – you cannot communicate enough with customers. Communication does not take a one-size-fits-all approach, either – you should consider things such as a CEO video embedded on your site, utilizing the front-line account team to alert customers of the coming survey (and take the lead on any follow-up), promoting the survey initiative in billing inserts, and so on. Taking a varied approach will maximize the probability that your customer will participate in the program.

Data breaches such as that experienced by Epsilon are unfortunate; it is my hope, however, that these tips will help you to take a proactive approach of getting ahead of the issue with respect to your customer listening initiatives. If you have other thoughts, please feel free to share them.


Mark A. Ratekin
Senior Vice President, Consulting Services

Three reasons to use unstructured data

Tuesday, February 22, 2011 by Leslie Pagel
From the tools, to the methodology, data analysis, and corporate structures, it is safe to say that customer experience strategy has evolved significantly over the last several years. One approach that has evolved is the use of unstructured data.

Customer strategy consultingWith new tools available to help capture and quantify customer comments, complaints, appraisals, and discussions, Customer Strategists are able to incorporate a broader range of customer feedback to magnify the areas needing attention and support corporate business strategy.


If you aren't already adding unstructured data as a part of your customer strategy program, consider the following benefits:

  • Combining the unstructured data with the structured data, such as financial information, operational metrics, and customer survey responses allows an organization to prioritize the areas that drive customer behaviors. Without it, a company might be tempted to act on the loudest voice, which might not influence future purchase decisions.
  • Most business decisions require evidence and validation before resources are allocated. Leveraging all sources of customer information builds confidence that the organization is dedicating resources wisely.
  • The words customers use to describe a company, product, problem, or positive experience adds context and can be helpful in developing customer communications.
What do you think? How are you leveraging unstructured data to improve the customer experience?

Photo credit: Killfile

Have you practiced presenteeism?

Wednesday, January 5, 2011 by Chris Woolard
You are probably thinking, what on earth is presenteeism and how would I know if I have done it?  Well I bet you have and if you are like most employees, you do it more often than you should.  Presenteeism is when an employee shows up to work, even when they are sick, thus infecting everyone else.  They also tend to not be as productive as they would have been had they stayed home, gotten better, and returned to work full strength.  Now you see why I said you have done it.  Let's face it we all have. 

I heard this term the other day when speaking to the CEO of Healthiest Employers, Rod Reasen II.  Healthiest Employers is a research company which focuses on wellness.  They have a proprietary measure of an organization's approach to wellness and highlights the healthiest employers in cities across the country, along with providing trends and data on best practices for wellness. 

When I was reading about presenteeism, the term was generally defined in a wellness setting.  However, I did see one or two definitions that had an employee engagement component.  I think that makes sense, how many employees today are exhibiting these same behaviors, or lack thereof (lack of productivity, infecting everyone else around them with a bad attitude) because of their lack of loyalty to the organization and their general bad attitudes?  I have found anywhere from 20-30% of employees are Trapped, meaning they are not engaged to the organization but are going to stay, while another 30-40% are At-Risk for leaving.  I would think these two types of employees would be littered with employees mastering the art of presenteeism. 

I just finished a study surveying almost 2,000 Indiana residents on their outlook for 2011.   73% surveyed feel company sales will increase in 2011, 68% says customers spending will increase in the next six months, and 71% feel there will be an increase in need for products/services, however only 40% are going to increase hiring (more info on this will be released mid-to-late January).  Combine this with employee engagement levels at some of the lowest I have seen in years and this leads to an extremely disgruntled workforce, even more than we have seen in years.  

So what can you do?  Well this goes back to things I have been saying for years.  Focus on your employees by asking how they feel about the work environment and what could be improved, and then act on this results.  I believe one of the best things employers can do is to provide a future for the employees and give employees the tools, training, and opportunities to move up in an organization.  Companies that can do this are going to have employees that are going to be willing to stick with the company as things turn around and be instrumental in the success of the organization.  Those that do not are going to have a hard time digging themselves out of the recession. 


Want to know what I find most ironic about this?  As I write this, I have been suffering from a cold for three days, at work all of those days.  


The lowly survey program

Wednesday, December 8, 2010 by Patrick Gibbons
If your voice-of-the-customer initiative is known as “the customer survey program” in your organization, please change it!

I get frustrated when companies don’t position things effectively. If it’s all about the survey, you’re missing the point. Your initiative should be about customer insights and how they are used to make better decisions and prompt customer focused actions that will improve your company’s performance. No matter how strategic your initiative may be, you’re undermining it if you position it as nothing more than a survey program.

I don’t think people do this intentionally. However, some companies just never name their customer strategies and people just start referring to it as something very tactical, such as “the survey program.”

Here are some better examples:
  • A technology firm branded theirs as GROW – Gain, Respond, Own, and Win.
  • An information services company calls theirs Customers First!
  • A medical device firm branded their initiative as Vital Signs.
  • A telecommunications company labeled theirs Connected to Customers.
  • We call ours FOCUS – Focusing On Customer Understanding and Success.

Not only do these programs have a more intriguing name, they are more likely to be recognized as a more serious initiative within the organization.

So if you have a tactical name for your program, or you have no name, come up with something that will mean something to your people and be taken more seriously.

Patrick Gibbons
Principal, SVP

Embracing complexity

Monday, November 15, 2010 by Leslie Pagel
If you are responsible for customer retention strategies, growing market share, customer due diligence, or other complex customer centric strategies, I encourage you to watch this short video.  



In this video, Eric encourages us to zoom out to solve complex problems. This approach is true for customer survey research too.

When conducting a customer feedback survey, we should not limit our analysis to only the information provided in the survey.

Instead, we must zoom out and combine other sources of information, such as financial data, operational metrics, and an emerging source of information is social media chatter.

Are you zooming out to zoom in on your complex problem?

Five Trends We Can See From Examining the 2010 1to1 Customer Champions – Part 5

Friday, November 5, 2010 by Customer Feedback Analysis

This is the fifth part of a multi-part series on the trends we are observing among the 1to1 Customer Champions with respect to their efforts to build a customer-focused culture.

Part four of this series focused on how to leverage our employees in the action-taking process. Taking action is critical because it provides an ROI to your customers for the time investment they made to share their feelings and perceptions with you. It is also important, as taking action is the only way that we can trace the impact of our actions from a financial perspective.

The challenge that most organizations have – particularly in this challenging economic environment – is that resources are more scarce than usual. This means that firms are more likely to be short-staffed, so adding work to an already full list is a recipe to have our efforts to take action fall flat.

The key? We have to make the insights from customers relevant, easy-to-understand, and linked to the day-to-day work of all associates. How can customer loyalty practitioners manage this? This brings us to the next trend we are seeing among the 1to1 Customer Champions.

Trend #5: New (or Enhanced) Tools are Available

The 1to1 Customer Champions remind us of the tools that are available for us to leverage in our customer-focus efforts; some of these are new, while others represent the latest version/evolution of tried-and-true tools:

a)      CRM integration – The investments that firms have made over the last decade or so in the area of CRM are starting to show payoff – from a customer knowledge perspective, being able to link customer demographics/profiling information and actual behavior data to survey metrics creates the opportunity for more robust customer intelligence.

The impact of CRM integration is twofold – first, it provides a data infrastructure into which program findings can be warehoused; second, it can provide a myriad of other data that can be used in segmentation exercises. This provides a more credible framework within which to articulate ROI (for example, by using actual customer purchase behavior in lieu of a survey-based question around intended behavior).

b)      More powerful predictive modeling – The ability to integrate other data streams into customer survey data would be for naught without the ability to build sophisticated models. The computing technology available today means that analytic approaches that were either highly theoretical or too mathematically challenging even ten years ago are now accessible.

 

c)       Social media and text analytics – The newest tools that are emerging include data from social media sources coupled with the rapidly-advancing discipline of text analytics. The ability to harness these non-structured data sources is beginning to add incremental value to our customer analysis efforts; there is clearly more to come on this front.

These tools represent, in my opinion, a “data enhancer” rather than a wholesale replacement to current data streams – that is, they provide additional insight that can bring further clarity to the more traditional quantitative analysis.

What are the common threads of these tools? First, they leverage the latest technology; many of these tools and techniques were simply pipedreams a few years ago. Second, they recognize that data from disparate sources can and should be leveraged in a variety of ways. Finally, they offer to streamline processes that historically have been challenging (I can recall, for example, a time in my career when it was not uncommon for a customer list to be written on a sheet of paper vs. having a consolidated file of data). Streamlining these processes creates capacity for practitioners - for example, by eliminating time spent data-entering customer records and managing multiple customer data sources, we can work on more strategic initiatives - such as making customer information relevant, easy to understand and integrated into the everyday workflow process of all employees.

In my final blog of this series, I will discuss what outcomes that the 1to1 Champions will enjoy as a result of their efforts and will provide some recommendations on what steps you can take to ensure that your firm is seen as a customer-focused organization.

Mark A. Ratekin
Sr. Vice President, Consulting Services

We have all this data, but should we use it?

Wednesday, August 25, 2010 by Customer Feedback Analysis

Remembering back to my last post, the amount of data kept on a customer is increasing within organizations and tying this data to customer survey data could help us gain better insights into the customer experience. 

Potentially fulfilling every researcher's dream, using this data could open the door to massive amounts of data to analyze while answering business questions.   However, with that we can’t lose sight of the quality of the data. In other words, more bad data isn’t necessarily better. So keeping that in mind, before we use this data to help aid us in understanding our customers, we need to evaluate the data itself.

The first thing to do here is look to see what data you have available. This will help you gain a better understanding of where/how this data could enhance your understanding of the customer experience. For example, if only product information is kept for customers, then it would be logical to look at this data alongside a customer’s product ratings. This could help explain trends you are seeing in the data, as well as gain a profile of the type of customers that use particular products. A few examples of things to consider are…

·         Type of data?

o   Is it sales history? Customer demographics? Account Information (ex. size, tenure, etc)?

o   Do we have information for individual contacts within an account or simply account level information?

- How easily can this be linked to customer survey data? Are there common fields, such as customer ID, which can be used to link the data?

o   Is data tied to an individual/account or is it tied to departments within your company (ex. call center, agent)?

o    If there are metrics in the data (ex. Issue Resolution Days), how is it calculated by your company?

·         Location of data?

o   Is all this data stored in a central database? Spread out among different parts of the organization?

o   Is this data available for you to access? Format you can use?

The second thing to assess is the quality of the data to ensure that it is giving us accurate information about our customers. We don’t want to use customer data that has never been updated or doesn’t reflect the current customer’s situation. Instead we want this data to accurately reflect our customer as they are today so this information can be paired with their current perceptions of your company. A few examples of things to consider are…

·         Who owns this data?

o   How is it populated?

o   How often is it updated? 

·         Is there a lot of missing data?

o   Do we have data just for select segments of customers or for all customers?

This assessment will give us a better understanding of what the data is telling you, where it may be best used in the analysis, how best to link the data, how easy it will be to obtain and then any cautions/limitations that could be kept in mind with the use of this data. More to come next week on linking and benefits of using the data…

Becca Lewis

Director, Marketing Sciences

We have all this data, why don’t we use it?

Tuesday, August 17, 2010 by Customer Feedback Analysis

Most companies have operational metrics that they keep about the ways they interact with customers, as well as an abundance of customer information through CRM tools. For example, support centers keep track of metrics such as time to resolve, time on hold, etc. And CRM tools can give us information on account history, such as products purchased, tenure, etc. An ideal situation would be to link these sources of data with customer survey data in order to gain a fuller picture of the customer experience.

In terms of operational data, this information allows you to link perceptual ratings and op metrics to understand where to focus to gain the most improvement in the customer experience.  Knowing the actual metrics (ex. time to resolve issue) as opposed to simply the respondents perception (i.e., satisfaction, quality) of the time to resolve, adds another dimension to the data that can provide additional actionable information. For example, it can potentially tell you if your customer’s tolerance in the actual time it takes to resolve your issue as well as if there are different levels of tolerance for your customers. Additionally, it can help companies set their operational goals with the customers in mind so that company’s improvements will also help to increase the customer’s experience. 

In terms of CRM data, this could help add variables that would be useful in understanding the customer’s experience. For example, if see Account A’s score is significantly declining, CRM data can be useful in seeing what changes have occurred in our relationship with Account A that may help explain this decline. Are we really doing that much worse? Have they changed the products that they are buying with us? Another potential benefit is this could reduce the need to ask customers certain questions in the survey. For example, if we know why the customer called support then do we really need to ask that question in the survey?

As you can see, there are many benefits to linking this information during the analysis of customer survey data; however, there are some things that need to be considered during this process. 

·         What is the best level to link this data at? Is it for an individual respondent or at an account level?

·         Is CRM data kept up-to-date so that we can be confident in its accuracy? 

·         What do you do if customer’s survey data and operational data don’t agree?

·         Should Customer Data be a consideration when setting operational goals?

·         What are the other uses of CRM data?

Over the next few weeks, we will be discussing these considerations, as well as providing cautions and benefits surrounding each concept.

Becca Lewis
Director, Marketing Sciences


The focus of customer-focused companies

Friday, April 30, 2010 by Customer Feedback Analysis
Over the last month I've put out a few posts on the concept of customer-focused organizations and why I think the academic concept of market orientation is vitally important to understanding what it means. My first post provided some thoughts on customer centricity, my second post outlined my argument in favor of market orientation, and my most recent post went into detail on some of the detailed characteristics of a customer-focused organization.

As promised, this post will extend the discussion to the antecedents of market orientation - the organizational factors that allow for the creation of a strong and balanced customer focus. Antecedents are distinct from the indicators (aka, characteristics) of market orientation I discussed previously. Indicators tell you how much of something you have while antecedents tell you how to get more. Many companies make the critical error of thinking the two things are the same. For instance, conducting an annual customer feedback survey is an important indicator of being customer focused; however, simply implementing a customer feedback survey will not make you more customer focused. It only works if motivated by the correct underlying factors and philosophies.

So what are the factors that lead to true customer focused behaviors? The concepts discussed below are taken from one of the foundational frameworks for market orientation (Kohli, Jaworski & Kumar 1993). These concepts have been empirically tested by a vast array of subsequent research and hold up pretty well. The authors found three general categories of antecedents along with a few key sub-dimensions under each one:
  1. Senior management factors
    1. Committed to and take action on being customer-focused
    2. Willingness to take risks and tolerance of some failure
    3. Positive attitude toward change
    4. Marketing leaders are trusted by other senior management
  2. Interdepartmental dynamics
    1. Interdepartmental cooperation
    2. Formal and informal connections between departments
    3. Openness to ideas from other departments
  3. Organizational systems
    1. A balanced approach to organization structure (this is a complicated topic but generally you want some hierarchical departmentalization, but not too much of it).
    2. Market-based incentive structures with a focus on long-term organizational health (another complex topic I've blogged about a few times)
    3. Low incidence of "office politics"
So, how does this information help us craft a more customer-centric organization? I think it does two important things. First, it focuses on the factors that actually matter to creating an honest and long-lasting customer orientation. It cannot be bought or tricked into existence by a few external flourishes or a fancy marketing campaign - customers will see right through that eventually. It has to be built from the inside; from the very heights and depths of your organization.

Second, it illustrates that customer orientation is not easy. The list of items above are not easily created, which is why some people talk about customer orientation being in an organization's DNA - it is hard to create the above factors if they don't already exist. This may be dis-heartening, but it's actually good news for the organizations willing to make the commitment and put in the hard work. It means that true customer orientation will continue to be a strong, positive differentiator in the marketplace, which is why we continue to see the Walker Index drastically outperform the general marketplace. 

So get to work. The rewards are out there waiting to be captured!

Troy Powell, Ph.D.
VP, Statistical Solutions
 
List of all posts in this series:
  1. Re-centering on customer centricity
  2. A broader orientation for being customer-focused
  3. Characteristics of a customer-focused company
  4. The focus of customer-focused companies
  5. The moderation of customer focus

Characteristics of a customer-focused company

Friday, April 9, 2010 by Customer Feedback Analysis
"Market orientation refers to the organizationwide generation of market intelligence pertaining to current and future needs of customers, dissemination of intelligence within the organization, and responsiveness to it."

My last post defined the concept of market orientation and how important it is to our understanding of customer centricity. I believe you cannot be considered a customer focused organization without having a strong market orientation. I introduced Kohli and Jaworski's three dimensions of market orientation, which resonates with my understanding of true customer focus. But what I really like is their follow-up work creating a scale for actually measuring market orientation and customer focus (Kohli, Jaworski & Kumar 1993).

It's great to share anecdotes, case studies, and general frameworks to help us become more customer focused, but it's even better to quantify and measure the concept. Then you can answer the question, "How customer focused are we and what can we do to improve?" Which seems like a pretty good question to answer.

Kohli, Jaworski & Kumar created and validated a scale of market orientation called MARKOR consisting of approximately 20 questions covering their three dimensions of market orientation. The scale is then administered to employees to assess a company's performance. This scale has been used in scores of articles since its creation, which indicates strong reliability. Scales like this help us better understand important concepts because each question is a validated observable attribute of an otherwise unobservable, latent concept.

So here are a few of the 20 indicators that measure market orientation in the MARKOR scale:

Intelligence Generation

  1. Meeting with customers to determine current/future needs.
  2. An in-house market research department.
  3. Ability to detect changes in customers' product preferences.
  4. At least annual surveys of customer perceptions.

Intelligence Dissemination

  1. Regular interdepartmental meetings on market trends and developments.
  2. Important events in the market or with key customers are shared quickly with all affected departments.
  3. Regular dissemination of customer satisfaction data at all levels of the company.

Responsiveness

  1. Recognition of changes in customers' product or service needs.
  2. Alignment of product development efforts with customer needs.
  3. Regular, interdepartmental planning to respond to changes in the business environment.
  4. Responsiveness to customer complaints.
  5. Making concerted efforts to modify products or services to fit customer needs.
Are these all the elements of a customer centric organization? Of course not. But these are some of the key differentiating characteristics of customer focused companies - the characteristics most likely to produce the beneficial company performance associated with high levels of market orientation. In other words, research has shown that companies with the above characteristics have significantly better long-term performance.

Of course, there is debate over the exact items to use in a market orientation scale and many changes/additions have been suggested over MARKOR's 17 years of existence, but the items above still give us a good start for understanding the specific characteristics that are strongly related to customer centricity and its positive business outcomes.

My next few posts will be discussing the antecedents and outcomes associated with market orientation and the contextual or environmental factors that affect how market oriented different companies need to be.

Troy Powell, Ph.D.
VP, Statistical Solutions
Walker Information

List of all posts in this series:
  1. Re-centering on customer centricity
  2. A broader orientation for being customer-focused
  3. Characteristics of a customer-focused company
  4. The focus of customer-focused companies
  5. The moderation of customer focus