The unique perspective of the channel

Friday, March 23, 2012 by Leslie Pagel

Customer Strategy ConsultingWhile Channel Partners are customers too, unlike the traditional customer, partners are able to provide a unique perspective. When it comes to Voice of Partner versus Voice of Customer survey research, consider these four differences:

1 - Many Channel Partners sell competing products and services giving them a unique perspective on what drives customer purchase decisions. Their input can help companies understand what causes a customer to purchase one product over another competing product.

2 - In a similar manner, OEMs can use partner input to understand what drives a partner to recommend one product over another.

3 - Many partners are combining an OEM's products with other products to deliver a complete solution. Having a better understanding of solution offerings, can be valuable input for the product group.

4 - Customers who purchase from a channel partner often go to the partner for support. Partners can provide a unique perspective on what is needed to support the indirect customer. This input can also be leveraged for serving the direct customer.

Corporate business strategy can benefit from insights provided by the channel. The partner perspective can be used to grow market share, enhance the product roadmap, and deliver an experience that both direct and indirect customers value.

If you are working to create a customer focused leadership position, consider including the perspective from all customer types.

Photo credit: stevendepolo

Do you know what problem you are trying to solve?

Monday, February 13, 2012 by Leslie Pagel

One common challenge customer-focused leadership faces is knowing the right question to answer or problem to solve. This isn't just a challenge reserved for customer strategists. It is a challenge faced by all leaders.

In the movie Moneyball, this challenge surfaces during a meeting where the Oakland A scouts discuss how they are going to replace their most valuable player. The discussion went something like this: 

Scout 1: "We're trying to solve a problem here Billy."

Billy Beane: "Not like this you're not. You're not even looking at the problem."

Scout 1: "Look Billy. We all understand what the problem is."

Customer Strategy ConsultingBilly Beane: "Good. What's the problem?"

Scout 1: "The problem is, we have to replace three key players."

Billy Beane: "No. What's the problem?"

Scout 2: "Same as it's ever been. We have to replace these guys with what we have existing."

Billy Beane: "No. What's the problem Barry?"

Scout 3: "We need 38 home runs 120 RBIs."

Billy Bean: Makes a buzzer sound indicating another wrong answer and goes on to explain the real problem.

Knowing the real problem that you are trying to address is the first step to developing a customer strategy that will ensure success. Before you get too far down any path, take a step back and challenge the problem you are trying to solve.

Once you've identified the real problem, you can design a customer satisfaction and loyalty program that is aligned with the true business need. 

For customer focused leadership, be innovative....and lean

Tuesday, January 24, 2012 by Jeff Marr
Many companies struggle when it comes to actually enhancing the customer experience. Even after customer initiatives are planned, time may pass and leaders wonder why customer scores aren't improving. Good intentions and plans are often not sustained, getting overtaken by the running of the business. I believe that teams planning action or customer-focused change would benefit from knowing they are being innovators and by adopting principles of lean innovation.

After all, taking customer-focused action is innovation. Adjusting a solution or service to fit what customers want is an upgrade, whether we call it "version 2.0" or not. People working on such projects become energized when they are recognized for creatively producing something new and important for the business.

The emerging practice called Lean Innovation offers a fitting tool for customer action planning because these principles begin and end with customer insights. For example, the first rule is knowing the customer's large "monetizable pain point", which of course would be a key driver of customer loyalty/retention -- which is what action teams typically work on today. Armed with customer relationship insights, teams start out a step ahead in the game of Lean Innovation.

However, the next Lean Innovation rule reveals where some action planning teams get off track. Customers can't tell you exactly how to fix the problem, just where the pain is. After you plan a change, customers will say whether the new approach helps or not. But action teams should be quickly creating the new concept/change to test on some customers, rather than spinning wheels seeking more data up front, hoping that customers will play the designer role. As the authors of the new book,Nail it Then Scale it say, "Entrepreneurs innovate, customers validate."

Action teams can become more entrepreneurial and effective by following principles of Lean Innovation. In the five stages posed in Nail it Then Scale it below which I adapted slightly to fit customer action planning, note how customers are kept engaged through the design process in the early stages:

1. Nail the pain -- fix on a key driver of customer loyalty needing improvement (based on feedback); craft a revised solution/service/process concept.

2. Nail the solution -- obtain customer reactions to the new concept, then to a simple prototype, then to quick iterations of same. Ensure your design reaches the point where the customers see real value, will pay more, etc.

3. Nail the go-to-market strategy -- learning exactly how the customer will effectively use and/or buy the new approach; who's on the "committee" using it and deciding where the value is. Do real testing with real prices, if applicable.

4. Nail the business model -- use customer insights from above to work out predicted usage, revenue streams and costs; as needed probe customers on how they will use, what they will buy, etc. Keep initial applications limited until business side proves out.

5. Scale it --  once the business model is set and functional, the change can be rolled and grown.

Another term from design engineers that fits this approach to customer focused change is incremental innovation -- taking a worst-performing aspect of something key to customers and fixing it, then moving to other aspects. I hope more of those responding to customer priorities will see themselves as the innovators they truly are. 

Innovative action-taking for customers

When choosing vendors, do companies 'right-size'?

Friday, October 28, 2011 by Jeff Marr
B2B vendors are selected for reasons that vary by buying sector and company. Vendor size wouldn't always be on a company's short list of decision criteria, but I believe the size of the vendor plays a larger role than some buyers would admit. Implied with the size preferences and other vendor choice criteria is the critical need for vendors to exhibit customer focused leadership.

From personal observation and limited research on the topic, it appears that when considering vendors to hire, companies use some common elements, but vendor size isn't always one of them. For example, at or near the top would be Right Product Capabilities -- knowing that the vendor's product/service fits the goals and needs of the buyer.
In the next tier would come (order will vary based on company and situation):
  • Technical Skill (for support and design)
  • Capacity/Scalability The buyer company is not only growing and changing, but may also try out a new vendor with a small piece of business before ramping up the purchase.
  • Competitive Pricing - the sum of vendor costs help keep the buyers competitive in their own markets
  • Reputation/Brand counts, but often more as table stakes in B2B --  such as assuring financial stability, that the vendor stands by its work, etc.
Vendor size may be closely related to some of these criteria, beginning with Capacity/Scalability. A small vendor won't always compete well with larger ones on breadth of product line, but may have a niche expertise to leverage in having the Right Product Capabilities.

Let me offer a few hypotheses regarding the impact of vendor size in the consideration and selection of vendors by many B2B companies.

1. There's a rule of thumb or "sweet spot range" on supplier size -- not too big or too small, (as measured by the percent of business the customer represents)
. If too small, say less than 1% of the supplier's business, and some believe you won't get enough attention. If too large, say over 10% of their business, then they may be over dependent on you and less able to withstand fluctuations in your volume (down or up). Here is one source supporting this notion and advising buyers to stay within the sweet spot range in picking vendors.

2. Bigger customers will look for big-enough vendors -- a minimal threshold to be of adequate size and/or brand/reputation to be considered. Part of the thinking has to do with Capacity/Scalability, but the other part is risk management for the company and the decision-maker. As the saying goes, "Nobody got fired for hiring IBM." Fewer are questioned in the corporate world for hiring a supplier of size and standing.

3. Bigger customers will lean toward smaller vendors as long as they are big enough (meeting other criteria). This is really a corollary of hypothesis #1. Large companies have been accustomed to being treated as major accounts with leverage in their supplier relationships. So they would rather represent closer to 10% than 1% of their vendor's business. This often means working with vendors that are not the largest in the sector.

For vendors, one implication is about marketing strategy -- realizing where the best match-ups might be in targeting customers, given your size. Also running through all the vendor choice criteria is the need to be customer focused. For example, as a market leader, vendors will have to remain nimble in order to compete with the smaller and ofter hungrier vendors in their space. They will also have to sell the buyer that they can "act small" in their customer focus and flexibility.

Surviving a Double Dip

Wednesday, October 12, 2011 by Phil Bounsall

Are we or aren’t we headed for a double-dip recession? Hard to say, especially since most of us feel like we never left the first recession. So how about this premise: It doesn’t matter. For most businesses right now, demand is soft, business could be better. Forget what the economists think about the macro-situation; let’s all worry about our own businesses and get them headed in the right direction.

What can we do to deal with the current environment that is, at best, apathetic and at worst, slowing from lethargic to near dead?

1.      Be confident. I’m not crazy and asking you to be confident in leadership or government. I am suggesting we all be confident in ourselves and in the value we each offer to our customers. That confidence is contagious and we could use a heavy dose of viral growth in the feel-good arena.

2.      Focus on success. Focusing on avoiding failure is much like trying not to lose—it almost certainly assures that you will. Look for ways to take advantage of the current market. Focus on positives and find the growth opportunities where you can.

3.      Celebrate wins. Don’t worry about the size of the wins, if you see some wins, call them out. Celebrate them. Get in the habit of winning. Constantly losing or underperforming tends to breed a culture or build a habit, even an expectation. Build an expectation of performance.

4.      Help your customers. First realize if your demand is not great, chances are your customers are hurting a little too. Can you help them solve some of their problems? That is what customer-focused companies do well.

5.      Co-create. Find ways to work together with your customers to identify the best way out of this bramble. There is no better time to innovate than now and no better partners than those you will be helping with your innovations.

6.      Partner with your best customers. Your best customers, those where the mutual value is the highest, are terrific sources of opportunity. If you are looking to grow your market share (after all, if the market is not growing you will have to take market share to grow), look first to grow your share of wallet within your best customers (those that view you as a partner.)

Double dip or not, there are ways for us to succeed in this soft economy. And guess what happens as one-by-one companies start to succeed? We dig ourselves out of this mess. Double dip? Maybe, maybe not. Long-term recession? It’s up to us.

This is Not About Baseball

Friday, September 23, 2011 by Phil Bounsall

This might start to sound like another sports story and candidly, it involves a sports team, the Chicago Cubs. But it is not a story about baseball, it is a story about loyalty. And let me tell you, being a Cubs fan since I was nine years old through thick and thin (OK, OK, through thin and thin) requires a LOT of loyalty.

There are a few theories as to why so many are loyal to a team that has been so unsuccessful (the Cubs have not won the World Series in over 100 years). The most common theories are the Cubs are loveable losers or have benefitted from the early nationwide broadcasts of Cubs games by WGN TV. I just heard a new theory about the real driver of loyalty to the Cubs -- what really brings people to fill the stands whether they are in last place, next to last place or teasing us with conference leadership. The new theory supposes that people are not loyal to the team, they are loyal to the Friendly Confines, Wrigley Field.Respect Wrigley, Bleachers

I just returned from a three generation (my dad, my son, and me) trip to Wrigley, and as much as it hurts me to say so, I think this theory has legs. I have been to at least 30 top-level professional sports venues and never do I feel the way I feel when I walk out of the inner concourse and get my first glimpse of the green grass of the infield and celebrated ivy covering the outfield walls. My first trip to Wrigley Field was 40 years ago and there have been many since, yet I still get giddy just thinking about entering Major League Baseball’s second oldest stadium.

SCoreboardHow is this related to loyalty? Well, the important question in this case is what drives loyalty? The Cubs team was recently purchased by the Ricketts family who will need to make many decisions about the future of the team. Wrigley Field is lacking in modern amenities for the players. Should they build a new stadium? Would that be meaningful in helping the Cubs win? What would it do to attendance? Would it change the experience that fans have enjoyed for so many years? What happens if fans really are loyal to the Wrigley Field experience and not to the team?

This is a pretty simple illustration of the shortcoming of minimal discussions with your customers. If you are going to reach out to your customers and ask them to take any time to answer questions, you had better make them count. They should help you make decisions, not post a number or keep a score. Simplicity is good but not if it leads to inaction or the wrong actions. There are no “silver bullets” in terms of understanding your customers. In order to make the right decisions in a customer-focused manner, your customer information must be predictive and prescriptive rather than short and simple.

One last caveat: I’m good with a new stadium if the Cubs would start winning World Series. But I really prefer them to win in good old Wrigley Field.


Where to Spend, Where to Cut

Thursday, September 15, 2011 by Phil Bounsall

When we are faced with uncertain times, the most important decisions we must make are centered around resource allocation. It usually boils down to answering this 2-part question: Where should we continue to spend (maybe even increase spending) and where should we cut back?

Different companies take different approaches, some going as far as cutting programs and resources that they admit are necessary to grow and succeed once we emerge from the economic funk we are in.

Let me propose a customer-focused approach to making these decisions. A quick clarification first: customer-focused does not mean do whatever the customer wants for whatever they want to pay. We still have to balance the needs of our business and our shareholders with that of our customers. But an approach that considers the customer and recognizes that the best way to succeed is to help customers succeed is a customer-focused approach. Your customer listening programs should give you incredible help in these decisions.

The areas in which we should continue to invest and perhaps even increase resource levels during tough times are those areas that are valuable both internally and to customers. Innovation is one of these areas…our customers are looking for new solutions and we need new solutions to grow. Innovation benefits us both and should probably continue to get resources. Initiatives that help us to deliver more value to our customers and therefore continue to realize reliable revenue streams are mutually valuable and need continued investment.

By contrast, some areas are important or valuable to neither our customers nor our businesses. You cannot cut fast enough in these areas. (Blogger note to self: any example you give here is going to hack off someone because you will be calling their efforts low value. Be smart for once and don’t go there. Better yet, create some crazy example that no one would believe. Nah, don’t be lazy, think up a real life example that is a good one…). John Chambers, CEO of Cisco Systems didn’t just cut in a low value area, he turned a low-value resource eater into a mutually valuable one. Chambers dumped private plane travel (no value for the customer, very little if any value for the company, high convenience value for the traveler) in favor of more frequent communication via Cisco Telepresence, putting Cisco’s product line in plain view of strategic customers.Customer Focused Value Matrix Kudos to Chambers for true Customer Focused Leadership.

Spending that is high value to the customer but low value to the company should be maintained unless it is actually detrimental to the company. In other words, low value might be acceptable if it is important enough to customers, but no or negative value is not. Same goes for spending that is of high internal value but not that valuable for our customers; maintain these areas unless they are of negative value to your customers (there are many items of no value to our customers—quality control, forecasting, accounting, bureaucracy—but necessary for our business. These are ok to maintain as long as they don’t hamper customer success. ). (Blogger note to self: Yep, you just had to go there.) These areas are important. But from our customers’ point of view, they are not value-added. Take quality control. We must deliver quality products or services and need quality checking to make sure that happens. But, customers expect it done or produced right, there is no value to them in terms of how you get there.

This model only addresses resource allocation and not individual performance. We still must deal with performance issues and look to increase the competence of our teams. After all, those teams deliver the value to our customers.

Before you cut, consider how many degrees away from customer success you are cutting. Lowering the value you deliver will start a cycle that has only a bad ending. Focus on your customer, think about your business. Find the areas that neither of you need and redeploy those resources into areas that neither of you can do without.

So Where are the Customer Initiatives?

Wednesday, August 17, 2011 by Jeff Marr
I wonder if you can't quickly check true customer focused leadership by simply looking for tangible evidence -- the initiatives, projects, metrics, etc., designed to deliver more value to customers. Without such initiatives underway, does a company deserve to call itself customer-focused?

These tangibles might be corporate but should be especially found within customer-facing processes or functions and strategic account teams. In each department it should be asked, "Where are the new projects and goals that will help earn customer commitment?"

I worked with a client some years ago that sold mission-critical equipment to businesses and was a global market leader at the time. They were very business development-oriented in their growth strategy. The feedback from buyers indicated a huge strategic opportunity for this company to enhance customer service, because salespeople didn't do much account management -- users were directed to call customer service with questions. Unfortunately, it wasn't always evident to the customer who to call or how to get their questions answered.

So this client made customer service a priority for improvement. And this was new thinking, because we found that despite having 100+ formal quality improvement projects underway company-wide, they had zero projects active within the customer service function, the number one customer-desired area to improve. This was shocking, but did lend urgency to making changes. They dramatically enhanced staffing and call software in customer service, made changes to the post-sale servicing approach, and have maintained their dominance in their global markets.

One lesson is in knowing the priority of your customers and doing something about it, but there's a bigger picture here. Customer listening should relate to the tangible initiatives underway in different departments and teams. As customer due diligence, the existence of those should be observed along with customer experiences.

The adage should probably be, "Without customer initiatives; we don't have customer focus."


Action Trumps Everything

Wednesday, August 17, 2011 by Turning Feedback Into Action

Once again, Willow Creek Association put on a tremendous Global Leadership Summit last week. As soon as Len Schlesinger started his presentation, I knew I was in for a whirlwind of new ideas and different ways of thinking. As President of Babson College (ranked #1 business school for entrepreneurship by U.S. News & World Report); former Harvard Professor; and noted author, he is an entrepreneurial genius. 

In the 1990’s, he and his co-authors helped us better understand how to build profitability in a service business via The Service Profit Chain (1997). Per Harvard Business Review, the service-profit chain established relationships between profitability, customer loyalty, and employee satisfaction, loyalty, and productivity.

More recently, Len Schlesinger has been focused on using entrepreneurship in all kinds of settings to create economic and social value. His book Action Trumps Everything (2010) makes the case that conventional approaches to problem-solving don’t work as well in an uncertain world.

Instead, a very simple framework used by successful entrepreneurs can be more effective: Act. Learn. Repeat.

1)      Act: Take a small step forward.

2)      Learn: Pause to see what you have learned by doing so.

3)      Repeat: Incorporate that learning into what you do next.

At Walker, we know that taking action can be one of the biggest challenges faced by customer strategists. I suspect that is due in part to our tendency to set aggressive, stretch goals that may at times seem unachievable. This can lead to inaction. But, what if we didn’t try to solve world hunger from the onset? 

What if we make a decision to just do something that might have a small impact? 

1)      Act: Take a small step. 

2)      Learn: After taking that first step, see what customers think and say about it in your customer feedback program. 

3)      Repeat: Then, incorporate that learning into your action plan and take another step forward.

Do we make the idea of taking action more difficult than it needs to be? 

Kitty Radcliff
Vice President, Consulting Services 

The CEO and customer strategy

Wednesday, July 6, 2011 by Patrick Gibbons
I think there are three types of CEOs when it comes to voice-of-the-customer strategies:
  • The kind that are focused on other things - financial management, operational efficiency, or any number of other business concerns. They know it is important to have customers, but they may not be very committed to hearing what they have to say. That is, until there's a problem.
  • The kind that are supportive, but not very involved - they know it's important to use customer insights in running the business, but aren't personally very involved. Instead, they leave it to others.  
  • The kind that are very customer focused - they know customer strategies drive performance and believe it is everyone's responsibility take action on customer insights. What's more, they are involved and set the example for the organization.

So we asked customer experience professionals at Forrester's Customer Experience Forum which type of CEO they have. Here is what they had to say:

Our CEO...

It makes sense that attendees at a conference on this topic would have customer-focused CEOs. Still, it's pretty encouraging. Only a small percentage gave their CEO a "focused on other things" rating and half of the customer strategists considered their CEO to be "very customer focused."

Leadership is so important. When the CEO and other senior leaders are committed to using customer insights to run the business, they set the tone for customer focused organization poised for market leadership.


This is part six of a series based on feedback collected from customer strategists at the Forrester Customer Experience Forum, June 21, 22 in New York. Other posts can be viewed here.


Patrick Gibbons
Principal/SVP



Three benefits of combining solicited feedback with social media discussions

Wednesday, June 8, 2011 by Leslie Pagel

Companies can enhance their customer retention strategies by combining the solicited feedback from their customer survey programs, complaint management systems, and sponsored communities with the unsolicited feedback that is available through social media.

Doing this can create the following outcomes:

Customer Strategy Consulting - combining solicited with social media1. Appropriate resource allocation. By relying solely on one type of information the complete picture might not be visible. However, if both solicited and social media discussions are viewed together it will accentuate areas of the business that impact both forms of feedback.

Consider this case study where customer feedback was gathered through a sophisticated and scientific survey program and combined with unsolicited feedback through social media. By combining these information sources, the company was able to allocate resources to the areas that impacted both information sources, instead of the loudest chatter on social media.

2. Engage in the right conversations. One objective for the social media strategist is to be active in the conversations that customers are having about the products, services, and brand. However, this can be a challenge since customers have a lot of different conversations. 

By combining solicited feedback with social media discussions, social media strategists can gain a clear view of the topics that create customer loyalty and understand how these areas are being discussed via social media. With this information, they can prioritize and engage in the conversations that will strengthen their relationships with customers.

3. Measure the ROI. Social media strategists continue to be challenged with demonstrating the ROI of their initiatives. Essentially companies want to know how their efforts are improving brand awareness or increasing customer retention. Through the solicited feedback, companies can identify if their social media strategy is paying off.

For example, one company found that customers who engage via social media are more loyal than customers who don't engage with them via social media. With this, they are able to segment and explore aspects of the customer relationship that are similar and different for customers who engage in social media versus those who don't. This can uncover approaches to increase the number of customers that engage online and build customer loyalty. 

Customer focused leadership has evolved tremendously over the past decade. Social media is one form of customer listening that isn't going away and it is time that we start integrating it into our voice of the customer programs.

In rough waters, stay focused on your customers

Wednesday, May 25, 2011 by Patrick Gibbons

If you are in a boat in choppy waters and you start to feel seasick, what do you do? While I'm no expert in marine medication, I have heard a common cure. Look to the landscape, find an object, and focus on it. As you stare at it, the commotion around you is not as evident to your body, your equilibrium adjusts, and your stomach begins to settle.

Over the last few years, a lot of businesses have been through some rough waters. Those that stayed focused on their customers have been able to endure the choppy economic environment and are now benefiting from better relationships, higher customer retention, increased customer loyalty, new insights on customer-focused solutions and much more.

It pays to show a little customer focused leadership when you're in rough waters.


Patrick Gibbons
Principal, SVP

Extending the demand for customers into two areas

Monday, May 23, 2011 by Leslie Pagel
Customer Strategy Consulting - Creating a demand for customers
Customer-focused companies outperform the market five-to-one. For these companies, the customer perspective is in demand and the customer strategist in charge is, as Seth Godin would say, a linchpin.

While there is a demand for the customer perspective, there are two areas where the demand should be inherent, yet oftentimes it's overlooked. These are:

Corporate Development
- When considering a merger & acquisition, companies often fail to invest in the single biggest and most valuable asset  - the customer base.

Walker has an approach to leverage the customer perspective from the target company to help inform the acquisition strategy. The approach helps the buyer manage risk during the due diligence phase and accelerate the accretion of value post-acquisition.

Product Development 
- In the MIT Sloan Management Review article titled, "Giving Customers a Fair Hearing," authors Anthony Ulwick and Lance Bettencourt state that "... not even 5% of the companies said there was agreement within their company as to what a customer need is." They discuss how this lack of understanding impacts the innovation process.

Companies need to improve how they are leveraging the customer perspective when assessing the market potential for innovation efforts. This will help companies prioritize innovation initiatives, avoid wasting resources on improvements that aren't necessary, and improve the success and speed of their initiatives.
Customer focused leadership creates a demand for the customer perspective throughout all facets of the business. Is your company leveraging the customer perspective during mergers and acquisitions due diligence and product development strategies?

The Walker Experience

Tuesday, May 17, 2011 by Leslie Pagel
Walker recently hosted its annual Walker Forum. During this three day event, held in Palm Springs, California, Walker clients and associates met to discuss customer retention strategies, growing market share, customer focused leadership, customer due diligence, channel/partner strategies, and a variety of other topics.

Some highlights from the event include:
  • Client interactions - Walker clients shared their journey and best practices for leveraging customer, partner, and employee insights to create world-class outcomes. We heard numerous stories about individuals who have used the customer or partner perspective to drive change within their organization and generate a return on the investment.
  • Roundtable discussions - Walker clients and Walker associates facilitated roundtable discussions on the topics of 1) strengthening channel/partner relationships , 2) engaging account teams, 3) leveraging the customer perspective for a competitive advantage, and 4) increasing the value of customer comments through text analytics.
  • Customer Strategy ConsultingSix working sessions  - Walker consultants facilitated discussions and activities related to each of the six essential elements for world-class listening (see diagram for the six elements). Each session included a description of world-class and steps for getting there.
  • Social time - There were several opportunities to network and interact with all of the attendees and to enjoy the Palm Springs destination.
Looking back on the event, it is clear that the companies who attend the Walker Forum have momentum and are achieving world-class outcomes through their customer and partner programs. They are the most sophisticated of their kind.

Want to get attention from your audience?

Monday, February 28, 2011 by Leslie Pagel

Customer focused leadershipTry expressing uncertainty. It might work.

Research from Zakary Tormala of Stanford Business School shows that experts who express some uncertainty can be more compelling and more likely to capture the attention of their audience.

This Harvard Business Review article and recorded interview highlights the findings from Zakary's research, including when a CEO might want to exude certainty and when she might want to be less certain.

One common obstacle for customer experience strategy is capturing attention from internal and external audiences.

Could this research help overcome this barrier? It has raised several questions:

  • Are customers paying attention to your requests for their feedback? If uncertainty is expressed, could it prompt more customer participation?
  • Similar to customer participation, could showing some level of doubt prompt action from account managers?
  • Who should send the message? Should it be someone who is already accomplished or someone with the potential to be great?
  • When are customers motivated by "objective truth" (like expert eye witness testimony) versus the "subjective domain?" 
Despite these questions, there is one element that Zakary's research confirms for customer focused leadership. Regardless of expressed certainty or uncertainty, the communication must be relevant and compelling.

It's not about the touchpoints or experiences

Friday, February 4, 2011 by Jeff Marr


I've been reminded lately that having strategic customer focus isn't about all your customer processes and touchpoints. Customer Experience or focus shouldn't mean executing every touchpoint throughout the lifecycle a certain way, but doing certain things so well that customers choose you.

In my household, we find ourselves choosing smaller, more nimble businesses to do business with, such as an electrician hired the other day over the company we normally use. He offered a shorter lead time and an appointment time rather than, "We'll be there between Noon and Five." I expected the other stuff to be done well enough -- like getting the fixture installed right -- but I hired him because he would come on a day's notice and meet at an appointed time, as that made life so much easier for us.

It's the same in B2B. Customers buy from those offering certain unique outcomes, while doing the other stuff well enough. The Corporate Executive Board (CEB) found in a recent study that companies aren't preferred because they perform all or most their customer touchpoints better. Instead, the winners, like my new electrician, were delivering certain unique benefits to the customers -- ones they couldn't easily find elsewhere that made customers' lives easier in some way. More specifically, they found that the preferred companies would:
  • Choose a small number of "unclaimed" benefits to provide through their experience.
  • Identify and overinvest in the one or two touchpoints where they can best showcase those unique benefits.
  • Use other touchpoints to reinforce their unique benefits.
Customer focused leadership means being strategic and even selective. It doesn't mean that every process must be perfect or changed to fit your brand -- just the ones that mean the most to your buyers.

A CEO's Advice

Thursday, September 23, 2010 by Managing Strategic Accounts

Next week, we’re holding another of our Walker Forum events (www.walkerinfo.com/walkerforum). Recently at these events, we’ve been focusing on key aspects of customer-focused companies and how they compete, operate, adapt, etc. One of these areas of focus has been leadership. At our last Forum, we held a panel discussion among four executive sponsors of customer listening efforts in their organizations (summarized in a prior blog post at: http://blog.walkerinfo.com/blog/walker-information-blog/page/4).

Next week, we’re taking it a step further. We’ll be conducting a virtual interview with the CEO of an extremely customer-focused high-growth company. In the interview, he'll share his advice to other CEOs trying to rally their organizations around customers (and reap the benefits of that):

1.       Be seen and heard talking with and listening to customers – make sure the entire company knows this is your top priority.

2.       Put an objective rewards system in place to drive your desired behaviors – in this case, it’s a stock award when customer metric goals are achieved.

3.       Race to success – set high long-term goals and work back from those to drive annual plans to get to those goals as quickly as possible.

He suggests this approach will make a company’s shareholders as happy as his are – and, trust me, they are!

 

Sonya McAllister

Principal/SVP

Hammering the Competition

Thursday, March 18, 2010 by Phil Bounsall

Customer-focused companies hammer the competition. Measured as many different ways as we can come up with, every time, companies that are customer focused beat those that aren’t. And not by a little either. They hammer them.

For the last 15 years, we have maintained the Walker Index. The Walker Index is a stock index comprised of our clients—companies that are customer focused and use that focus as a lever to generate better performance. Over the last 15 years, these companies have outperformed the marker by a multiple of 5 to 1!

Sort of begs the question, “What are these companies doing differently that allow them to consistently be high performance companies?” Here’s their secret. There are three areas that make them different, but all three are characteristics that are simply part of their culture, they are subconscious and second nature.

The first characteristic is their customer-focused leadership. All the leaders in the company put the customer first, starting with the CEO. And it isn’t lip service. They really mean it, they demonstrate it with their actions. The importance of customer relationships is part of all internal business reviews. It is discussed on earnings calls. It is viewed as a competitive advantage within the company, not an area to score once in a while.

The second characteristic is the infrastructure built to accommodate customer-focused initiatives. This infrastructure makes customer insights part of the management information system, no different than financial or operating data. It also ensures that the customer perspective is part of every strategic plan or critical decision made by the company. Customer focus is part of the culture of the company, its built into the processes that all employees use every day.

The third characteristic is also part of the culture. These companies are never satisfied that they have done enough to help their customers succeed. They have an insatiable thirst for action to improve the value delivered to their customers. Some call this a bias for action. Call it what you want, but it is a game changer. The companies that use customer focus as a differentiator are constantly listening to customers and acting on their learnings in a quest to help their customers achieve their goals.


We all strive to be high performance companies. And who doesn’t want to hammer the competition? Our companies can use the perspectives of our customers to leverage an effective competitive advantage, grow our market share and improve our margin structure. But only if we have these critical characteristics in place.

Customer focused -- "born" that way?

Thursday, December 3, 2009 by Patrick Gibbons
Sometimes we are lulled into believing that things are just made a certain way and can't really be changed.

Are you good at art? Most people will say "no." In fact they may say they are awful, or don't have an artistic bone in their body. In other words, they believe that artistic talent is something you are born with -- you either have it or you don't.

It's not true. While some have a natural inclination for such skills, artistic talent can be developed. There is a classic drawing book titled Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain. The author Betty Edwards shares loads of examples of ordinary people that learned to draw using her methods.

Sometimes I believe we feel the same way about our companies being customer focused. There is a tone or a feeling that is often hard to describe. Sometimes we call it culture or customer centricity or say it is part of their DNA (a term I'm not fond of -- see previous blog). Using these terms make it feel like you either have it or you don't.

In reality, I think it is an integral system of tactics that really bring focus on the customer. Leadership sets the tone. But after that it's the nuts and bolts. It's how companies gather customer insights and put them to use. It's how they communicate the importance of customer initiatives and engage the enterprise. Its how they make sure the right people have the right information to make customer focused decisions and take action.

Just like the artist that practices, develops their skill, and consistently improves over time, companies need to do all the little things that drive customer focus in their business. The best news -- the results will prove all their efforts to be worthwhile.

Hypothetically Speaking

Thursday, October 22, 2009 by Customer Feedback Analysis

Science has advanced mainly through failed hypotheses. New theories, ideas, or inventions are based on the invalidation of a previous hypothesis. This type of advancement is also true in other arenas, including business. However, most people focus on confirming hypotheses and spend little, if any, time looking for contrary evidence. I think there are a number of reasons for this:

  • We have an emotional investment in the hypothesis and want to be right. This is especially true when we created the hypothesis or when our job is seemingly dependent on the hypothesis being true (which is hardly ever true, even when it seems to be).
  • Our boss or executive leader is a big proponent of the hypothesis, and we don't want to contradict them.
  • We created a bad hypothesis that really can't be invalidated.
  • We don't even consider that our assumption or belief should be tested and skip creating a true hypothesis. We treat our assumption as a statement of fact and then go about putting together all the evidence that supports it without even considering contradictory evidence.

In a business context, focusing too much attention on confirming our hypotheses can lead to lethargy, a culture of acquiesence, and poor business decisions. Most hypotheses are created from our assumptions about what is true or what has been true in the past. So focusing only on affirming hypotheses will result in an organizational culture that doesn't question assumptions and continues to do what it's always done.

This can be espescially dangerous when developing customer insights or customer strategies. Faulty assumptions and flawed, stagnant processes are most prevalent where the customer is involved. Hypotheses are generally formed by our perspective and not the customers'. We fully expect the customer will love our new product and find all sorts of evidence to support that view. However, customers hate it, and the product fails. Or we assume our service is far superior to our competitors and customers will not be swayed by their advancements. Then we find that customers are defecting to the competition in droves.

I would encourage everyone, especially those responsible for developing customer strategies, to do five things:
  1. Create a culture of testing and inquiry. It is essential to moving your company forward.
  2. Develop good hypotheses based on your assumptions. 
  3. Know what it would require to disprove the hypothesis.
  4. Try to find good, solid evidence against your hypothesis. The supporting evidence is much easier to find. 
  5. Be willing to challenge the common wisdom of your company or leadership when the hypothesis is shown to be wrong. This can be uncomfortable, but if you do it respectfully and with the support of strong evidence, the message should be accepted. It also helps to have a few other colleagues in your corner! 

Disproving a hypothesis can be uncomfortable, especially when it's based on a widely held belief. But if it's not true, and you don't do disprove it, someone else will - either a colleague or a competitor. And you may miss the chance to make the next big advancement for your company, your industry, or maybe even the world. 

Troy Powell, Ph.D.
VP, Statistical Solutions